[137548] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?UTF-8?B?UmU6IExvY2FsIHJvb3Qgem9uZSAoV2FzIE5ZVGltZXM6IEVneXB0IEw=?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Wed Feb 16 17:36:13 2011
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:36:03 -0500
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <5E883CE1-AE35-41B6-971B-F40A36730771@cisco.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/16/11 4:25 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> I don't think that the Egyptian shutdown of domain names had much effec=
t ...
ditto.
i'm not aware of any actions by the .eg registry operator, though i'll=20
ask, coincidental to the prefix withdrawal.
i suppose in the interests of completeness i should also ask about the=20
(wicked recent) (=D9=85=D8=B5=D8=B1.) IDN ccTLD.
these are both wicked small zones, relative to the density of names=20
registered (registries other than .eg) by egyptian residents, and the=20
larger number of network using egyptians.
it is possible that as a preliminary step, the recursive resolver=20
operators of each of the subsequently prefix withdrawing providers=20
modified their cached data to provide policy-based resolution.
-e