[137518] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NIST and SP800-119
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Tue Feb 15 11:07:53 2011
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimY3JNVW7CEJxkEWZ5=7J6Mm20VMspUfZC0aduy@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:06:09 -0500
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2011-02-15, at 10:36, William Herrin wrote:
> Are you aware of a TCP implementation in an OS that shipped within the
> last decade but doesn't enable IPv4 pMTUd by default?
I am not, but I'd still be vaguely interested in an actual study :-)
The last time I tangled with v4 pMTUd it actually was a decade or more =
ago. At that time wholesale ICMP blocking caused all kinds of problems =
for clients with a sub-ethernet MTU in their path. If the world has =
moved on, that seems good :-)
Joe=
