[137403] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Sat Feb 12 01:20:21 2011
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Tom Limoncelli <tal@whatexit.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 06:20:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikdxb=1W29z5P9NN9kxrF7sN33x90HH88zeYfFu@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
> I don't want to accidentally encourage an urban legend or rumor. (For
> example, I can't find verification to the rumor that ARIN rejected a
> request from LTE providers for IPv4 space and instead told them to go
> straight to IPv6.
Not quite correct - A while back we did explain the policies regarding=20
slow-start and the potential for operators to run into IPv4 depletion=20
while still early in capital depreciation for their nextgen network.=20
That's not rejection, just fair warning... :-)
/John
John Curran=20
President and CEO
ARIN
