|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <33020353.1007.1297454809458.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:43:56 -0800 To: Franck Martin <franck@genius.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > = http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-mean= s-for-marketers-048657/=20 >=20 > I can hear people, say oh no....=20 >=20 > Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.=20 They missed an important point. > Who Will Be Impacted: For more consumers, there will be negligible = impact. "The ISPs will be handling much of this,=94 said Leo Vegoda, a = researcher with ICANN. (via TechNewsWorld). Some technology users may = experience some glitches, such as people using VPN software to connect = with their offices or users of point-to-point software such as Skype, he = adds. Anyone that uses a residential router (Linksys, D-Link, Netgear, etc) is = likely to need to upgrade that, most likely by buying a new one. Set-top = boxes are generally IPv4; anyone with a TV is likely to need to upgrade = at least the software. Skype is not yet IPv6-capable, and will need one = an update. "The ISPs will take care of this" is a really empty hope. The = ISPs will take care of their part, but users should expect that there = will be things jiggling over the coming couple of years.=
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |