[137336] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Fri Feb 11 06:08:27 2011
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:07:26 -0200
In-Reply-To: <op.vqp7zejstfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> =
wrote:
>> Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments =
along these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with =
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. Given the publication of 1814, you =
can probably guess how far those arguments fared.
>=20
> You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" =
part. Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space =
to use. (and that works 99.999% of the time.)
>=20
Except in acquisitions and private peering.
as=
