[137302] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Roesen)
Thu Feb 10 18:09:11 2011
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:08:19 +0100
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20110210000726.3CABE9DCC09@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:07:26AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Double NAT prevents most of the work arounds working.
And quite important for residential ISPs of some size: have fun teaching
your call centers diagnosing double-NAT failure modes.
NAT444 is a hell I don't want to visit really.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
