[137294] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is your ASN advertising v6 prefixes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Thu Feb 10 17:26:03 2011
In-Reply-To: <4D538BE7.40208@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:24:23 -0800
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> wrote:
> On 2/10/2011 12:42 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>>
>> Prefixes Originated (v6): 4
>>
>>
>> Why 4?
>>
>
> Click on the v6 prefixes tab and look at them. There's a US, Taiwan and
> Europe /32's, and then one additional /48 out of the US /32.
>
> Jack
more specifically, we did an initial /48 test deployment, to make sure we
weren't going to screw things up royally, then we anchored a /32 in each
registry region we do business in, and announced those out. Now that the
testbed phase is over, I can probably go back and remove that more specific,
since the covering /32 is in place; but the other 3 /32s can't be aggregated.
Matt
