[137288] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 considerations in IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Thu Feb 10 16:51:07 2011
To: Ryan Rawdon <ryan@u13.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:34:04 CDT."
<acd7c570039e58b67bbf64e467f4b12b@192.168.152.50>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:50:46 +1100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <acd7c570039e58b67bbf64e467f4b12b@192.168.152.50>, Ryan Rawdon writes
:
>
> Hello NANOGers -
>
> What considerations should be made with respect to implementing egress
> filtering based on source IPv6 addresses? Things like allowing traffic
> sourced from fe80::/10 in said filters for on-link communication (for the
> interface that the filter is applied to). Is there anything else that
> should be taken into account while implementing BCP38 egress filtering in
> IPv6?
>
> Ryan
You should definitely make sure you block ULA prefixes leaving your
site by default.
e.g.
add unreach admin all from any to fc00::/7 via gif0
add unreach admin all from fc00::/7 to any via gif0
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org