[137282] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (R. Benjamin Kessler)
Thu Feb 10 16:05:57 2011
From: "R. Benjamin Kessler" <Ben.Kessler@zenetra.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>, "Stephens, Josh"
<Josh.Stephens@solarwinds.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:05:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimqE_yXnBqO9HyrBVfrViLWhhYM+Kz_=M1W8yhF@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>From: William Herrin [mailto:bill@herrin.us]=20
>* Carrier NAT...
I spend most of my days fighting with "carriers" to actually carry bits fro=
m point A to point B like they're paid to do. =20
I'm sick and tired of them blaming CPE for circuit bounces and outages that=
are magically "fixed" without us doing anything to CPE.
I have absolutely ZERO confidence that the carriers can implement NAT on a =
global scale such that it works and actually provides decent customer servi=
ce.
(realizing that this broad characterization is probably unfair to many smal=
ler carriers who actually give a crap; my daily pain is generally caused by=
the "Tier 1" guys)
