[137256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Feb 10 10:54:14 2011
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:53:24 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <E5054CD4-C4D0-4D81-A296-FF8D1F4F43E2@queuefull.net>
Cc: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/10/2011 8:36 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
> DS-lite is still CGN.
It is still LSN, but it is not NAT444, and the failure rate reduces
because of that. Also, DS-Lite guarantees that you have IPv6
connectivity. NAT444 makes no such assertion.
Jack
