[137253] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 10 10:45:26 2011
To: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:15:52 GMT."
<ij0ktp$t9f$1@dough.gmane.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:48 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1297352568_4929P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:15:52 GMT, David Freedman said:
> these people are doing this by design, I think thats the point I'm
> trying to get across, if you will never need to process TOOBIG in your
> design, there is no need to accept it.
And how many networks break PMTUD because their design says they never need to
deal with ICMP so there's no need to accept it, or break DNS because TCP/53 is only
used for zone transfers that should never happen, or...
--==_Exmh_1297352568_4929P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNVAd4cC3lWbTT17ARAvA2AJ4vpUwjwzCuQSFQk6fKWnSZ6ZhtHACeNN47
5PCuP4pcFQaelYmkgYppPbY=
=qpir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1297352568_4929P--
