[137189] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Wed Feb 9 20:01:38 2011
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:01:46 MDT."
<4D532AEA.2090505@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:01:15 +1100
Cc: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <4D532AEA.2090505@brightok.net>, Jack Bates writes:
> On 2/9/2011 5:56 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> > Or 6rd and go native on their permanent prefix as the forklift upgrade
> > schedule allows. Oh well, it's better than nothing or Crummier Grade NAT.
>
> ds-lite tends to be friendlier LSN from various tests, and is native v6.
>
> Jack
DS-Lite over 6rd using RFC 1918 / multi-use ISP assigned block
(I'd love to be able to say class E here) provides a single NAT
translation for IPv4 and public IPv6.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
