[137176] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Wed Feb 9 19:05:32 2011

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:01:46 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
In-Reply-To: <86lj1ohie8.fsf@seastrom.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 2/9/2011 5:56 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Or 6rd and go native on their permanent prefix as the forklift upgrade
> schedule allows.  Oh well, it's better than nothing or Crummier Grade NAT.

ds-lite tends to be friendlier LSN from various tests, and is native v6.


Jack


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post