[137139] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Smith)
Wed Feb 9 16:04:28 2011
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC1397F@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:00:26 -0500
From: Josh Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com>
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> wrote:
>>
>> I never thought it was that bad. In some 3G/wireless networks in
>> Germany
>> the providers use NAT and transparent HTTP-proxy. But this is only
>> wireless. I'm not aware of any DSL or Cable provider NATing their
>> customers.
>>
>> Jens
>
> Practically all broadband providers NAT their customers in the US. =C2=A0=
If
> you look at the largest ones which are probably Comcast, Verizon, and
> AT&T, you have the majority of US broadband subscribers right there.
>
>
>
>
Are you sure about that - I'm a comcast subscriber and see no signs
that I am being natted?
Thanks,
--=20
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber:=C2=A0 juicewvu@gmail.com
phone:=C2=A0 304.237.9369(c)