[137130] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jens Link)
Wed Feb 9 15:39:20 2011
From: Jens Link <lists@quux.de>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:38:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0BC1397D@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
(George Bonser's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:23:30 -0800")
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
"George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com> writes:
> While that is true, it is no worse than the situation right now. In the
> US, the vast majority of users are already behind a NAT (I would say
> over 90% of them are) so they are already experiencing this breakage.
I never thought it was that bad. In some 3G/wireless networks in Germany
the providers use NAT and transparent HTTP-proxy. But this is only
wireless. I'm not aware of any DSL or Cable provider NATing their
customers.
Jens
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | ------------------- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
