[137126] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Wed Feb 9 15:29:19 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik2on2P_NBCQzaEA-So1HQ3vD=R=_mFVR_CKcH3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:24:26 +0100
To: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9 feb 2011, at 21:17, George Herbert wrote:
>> Once we're at 128-bit addresses then we can migrate to IPvA (7 - 9 =
are already taken) without much trouble.
> I know about IPv8 (sigh), and the Chinese abortive IPv9 claim, but
> when did 7 happen?
RFC 1475, apparently:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-numbers.xhtml=
