[137120] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jens Link)
Wed Feb 9 15:14:19 2011
From: Jens Link <lists@quux.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:11:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102091459200.15471@murf.icantclick.org> (david
raistrick's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:00:52 -0500 (EST)")
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
david raistrick <drais@icantclick.org> writes:
> And at what point during that time did they have any vendor gear they
> could purchase that -would- support v6? At -best- during the last 5
> years, but I'd put money on that even today they can't purchase gear
> with adequate v6 support.
Another chicken and egg problem here. Customers have no demand for IPv6,
vendors don't implement it. Vendors don't implement it, customers don't
use it.
Sad but true. Right now I have two TAC request open with Cisco
regarding IPv6 problems on the ASA. Ever tried traceroute to a
dual-stacked or IPv6 only host? ;-)
Jens
BTW: No need to cc me I'm reading the list.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | ------------------- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
