|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:08:10 -0600 From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> To: david raistrick <drais@icantclick.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102091459200.15471@murf.icantclick.org> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 2/9/2011 2:00 PM, david raistrick wrote: > And at what point during that time did they have any vendor gear they > could purchase that -would- support v6? At -best- during the last 5 > years, but I'd put money on that even today they can't purchase gear > with adequate v6 support. Supply and demand. There was no demand (most of my vendors didn't get any requests/questions concerning IPv6 until roughly 6 months ago). J and C have had considerable support (though still a work in progress) for some time, though I'd agree that 5 years sounds about right (it takes 1 large core network to push C/J into implementing base IPv6, but it was originally around that customer's desires and not multipurpose). Jack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |