[137109] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TR Shaw)
Wed Feb 9 14:47:29 2011
From: TR Shaw <tshaw@oitc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B368DA6@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:46:45 -0500
To: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>,
North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> according to the
>> vendors selling CGNAT solutions the impact to end users is (almost)
>> unnoticeable.
>=20
> And according to a used car salesman, this here pickup truck was only =
gently driven by a little old lady to the shop once a week. There's =
going to be a lot of snake oil in the next couple years as very small =
ISPs struggle to implement native IPv6 over those aging DSLAMs and GPON =
systems that don't and won't support it.
LOL just try your cell phone... Mine works fine over office wifi but not =
over cellular. Its not just small ISPs; its tier1's as well.
Tom
