[137039] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Time Warner Transit
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Blackford)
Tue Feb 8 10:36:27 2011
In-Reply-To: <4D50896B.6030702@getsprocket.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 07:36:03 -0800
From: Bill Blackford <bblackford@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Wolff <chris@getsprocket.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
They route well as compared to some in the same league.
Latency is low. They must not over subscribe or run too congested.
Paths in and out of PTLDOR appear fairly optimal. Have no data on other geo=
's.
NOC support could be a bit more proactive.
-b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Christopher Wolff <chris@getsprocket.com> w=
rote:
> Hey guys,
>
> What are you thinking about Time Warner transit lately? =A0They claim to =
be
> fully ready to support IPv6.
>
> Thanks in advance, you can hit me offlist if you're not able to share you=
r
> TWTC opinion publicly.
> Christopher
>
>
--=20
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer
Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....
