[136860] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sat Feb 5 22:39:03 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4DF75E.1040109@brightok.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:34:19 -0800
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 5, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 2/5/2011 7:01 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> And did you change the amount of growth space you allowed for each =
pop?
>> Were you already constrained in your IPv4 growth space and just =
restored
>> your desired growth margins?
>>=20
> Growth rate has nothing to do with it. ARIN doesn't allow for growth =
in initial assignments. No predictions, no HD-Ratio, and definitely no =
nibble alignments.
>=20
Yet.
> Current policy proposal hopes to fix a lot of that.
>=20
Yes... 2011-3 for those who are interested in knowing more.
Owen
