|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <029BB8D0-BCBF-4E62-AA5F-6E44B4EC08D8@puck.nether.net> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:50:48 -0500 From: chip <chip.gwyn@gmail.com> To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins <ryan@deadfrog.net> >>> wrote: >>>>>> IPv6 from both of my upstream providers has been "coming soon" for >>>>>> about a year and a half. >>>> >>>> I'm getting ready to try to enable IPv6 natively with Above.net in >>>> the Chicago area. Has anyone had any experience with them? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ryan Wilkins >>>> >>> >>> Just wanted to throw in my 2 cents.... >>> >>> We're pretty much done with going dual-stack on circuits from Tiscali, >>> GBLX, Cogent, NTT/Verio, XO, and Telia. >>> >>> -- >>> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc.... >> >> Done as in it is complete and working? Or done as in you gave up trying? > > Speaking as the NTT (2914) people, i'm sure it's working. =A0If it's not,= they should phone support. =A0IPv6 is a production service with production= support. > > It would also break a fair amount of internal stuff if our IPv6 was not w= orking properly. > > - Jared Done as in having circuits in multiple pops in production. Several more providers should be coming online in Q1/Q2. --chip --=20 Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,=A0 batteries not included, etc....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |