[136738] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Fri Feb 4 15:41:59 2011
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <640AC628-0D14-4194-A195-3A58E6008917@humancapitaldev.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:41:52 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>=20
>> No, and in fact, I believe all the RIRs will probably do a reasonably =
brisk business in reclamation and reallocation, albeit in ever smaller =
blocks.=20
>=20
> As holder of a small block, this scares and irritates me. It scares me =
that I might lose my autonomy and future expansion through no fault of =
my own, and it irritates me that the reason I may be forced to give up =
my address space will probably be to satisfy the internet's desperate =
need for more spam cannons.
If you are using your block, why would you worry?
If not are not using your block, why would you need it?
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
