[136708] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Perry)
Fri Feb 4 08:40:48 2011
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:30:46 +0000
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Roland Perry <lists@internetpolicyagency.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110204000954.A64C79A9FED@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In article <20110204000954.A64C79A9FED@drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews
<marka@isc.org> writes
>> These are just my straw poll of what may be difficult for small
>> enterprises in a change to IPv6.
>
>It isn't "change to", its "add IPv6".
>
>I expect to see IPv4 used for years inside homes and enterprises
>where there is enough IPv4 addresses to meet the internal needs.
>It's external communication which needs to switch to IPv6. Internal
>communication just comes along for the ride.
If people start supplying CPE that are running IPv6 on the outside and
IPv4 NAT in the inside, then that would just fine, in the sense that the
users (in this case including the self-administrators of these small
enterprise networks) won't notice the difference.
--
Roland Perry
