[136662] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: External sanity checks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Horstman)
Thu Feb 3 21:28:15 2011
From: Justin Horstman <justin.horstman@gorillanation.com>
To: 'Greg Dendy' <gdendy@equinix.com>, Brandon Galbraith
<brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:25:45 -0800
In-Reply-To: <19C36902-4D62-4F3E-A4C3-6EDF72D8E62C@equinix.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
+1 vote for Gomez, they are the most advanced and most capable in this spac=
e. They are also not very cheap...
~J
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Dendy [mailto:gdendy@equinix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:35 AM
> To: Brandon Galbraith
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: External sanity checks
>=20
> Gomez isn't too bad either for the http side.
>=20
> http://www.gomez.com/
>=20
>=20
> Greg
>=20
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:29 AM, "Brandon Galbraith"
> <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > Pingdom will do most of what you're looking for (www.pingdom.com).
> We're
> > quite fond of them after a bad Keynote experience.
> >
> > -brandon
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Philip Lavine
> <source_route@yahoo.com>wrote:
> >
> >> To all,
> >>
> >> Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks
> against
> >> your web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency checks as
> well as
> >> application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc)
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Philip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Brandon Galbraith
> > US Voice: 630.492.0464
>=20
