[136611] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 3 16:55:35 2011
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:41:12 EST."
<483E6B0272B0284BA86D7596C40D29F9011F76964EA0@PUR-EXCH07.ox.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:50:38 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1296769838_6170P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:41:12 EST, Matthew Huff said:
> SMTP is definitely not a p2p protocol in most corporate environments.
Ahem. Please quit confusing "the protocol" with "that small segment of
the protocol we choose to allow/support on our network".
--==_Exmh_1296769838_6170P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNSyMucC3lWbTT17ARAhAeAKD09Xa3zmfP+16s0ljTrwdgDiLangCglW8D
cDPzzPlXegH3COp+b8UWd1M=
=P1Ex
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1296769838_6170P--
