[136588] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Perreault)
Thu Feb 3 15:55:42 2011
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:46:06 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <201102031529.12870.lowen@pari.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2011-02-03 15:29, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, February 03, 2011 02:55:39 pm Jack Bates wrote:
>> Do you think we have to have a standard for them to implement it?
>>
>> If they can ignore the CPE router rules, they can implement NAT66 on
>> their own, too.
>
> See the map66 Sourceforge.net project. Already happening.
OpenBSD's pf has had stateful NAT66 for many years...
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
