[136574] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Palmer)
Thu Feb 3 15:13:28 2011
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:12:26 +1100
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4D4ADC36.1080803@brightok.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 10:30 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> >I'm perfectly happy with an IPv6 network that only has rational
> >people on it while those who insist on NAT stay behind on IPv4.
>
> I'm perfectly happy with watching the Internet go to hell; as it has
> been, and IPv6 will just escalate it. :)
I am intrigued by your ideas, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Actually, I must agree that since I've stopped doing IT work professionally,
I've found myself far less emotionally invested in this kind of thing, and
far less worried about the world ending (which, let's face it, it rarely
does). Does wonders for the blood pressure.
- Matt
