[136555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lamar Owen)
Thu Feb 3 14:07:13 2011
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:04:45 -0500
From: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4D4AF582.6080902@brightok.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 01:35:46 pm Jack Bates wrote:
> I understand and agree that CPEs should not use NAT66. It should even be
> a MUST NOT in the cpe router draft.
Do you really think that this will stop the software developers of some CPE routers' OS code from just making it work? Do you really think the standard saying 'thou shalt not NAT' will produce the desired effect of preventing such devices from actually getting built?
