[136494] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Feb 3 11:18:15 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4AC31F.1050000@brightok.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:12:55 -0800
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 2/2/2011 8:38 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>=20
>>> =46rom the main section on =
https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html:
>>=20
>> "... ISPs with both IPv4 resources and IPv6 resources pay the larger =
of the two fees."
>>=20
>> It is not mentioned anywhere in the waiver stuff.
>>=20
>=20
> The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing =
scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves 1 =
rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively doubles =
your price anyways. :)
>=20
>=20
> Jack
Actually, so far, most ISPs are finding themselves one rank lower.
The exception is particularly small providers and there is a combination =
of suggestion (about fees) and policy (Proposal 121) effort underway to =
rectify that problem.
Owen
