[136488] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Thu Feb 3 11:02:26 2011
In-Reply-To: <5C836A1A98186142A6BEC393FD5E2A8601578D@hal.photon.com>
From: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:39:28 -0500
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: trejrco@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 08:11, Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com> wrote:
> Our classified networks aren't ever going to be connected to anything
> but themselves either, and they need sane local addressing. Some of
> them are a single room with a few machines, some of them are entire
> facilities with hundreds of machines, but none of them are going to be
> talking to a router or anything upstream, as neither of those exist on
> said networks.
>
Correct me if I am wrong, but won't Classified networks will get their
addresses IAW the DoD IPv6 Addressing Plan (using globals)?
/TJ
