[136371] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Payne)
Wed Feb 2 15:14:21 2011
From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
In-Reply-To: <BA018CEA-0A55-4D16-AFD7-EAAD1B30F345@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:21 -0500
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>=20
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:40 AM, John Payne wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>=20
>>> NAT66 is different. NAT66 breaks things in ways that impact sites =
outside of the site choosing to deploy NAT.
>>=20
>> Examples?
>=20
> SIP
> Network enabled Video Games
> Peer to Peer services of various forms
> etc.
I chose NAT66. How does that affect you or any other site?
Note that I have already blocked games and peer to peer either =
technically or via policy.... and I have no SIP end points that have any =
business talking outside the enterprise.
Just rephrasing you slightly. NAT66 will break applications that many =
enterprises will already have blocked at their perimeters.
