[136282] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Wed Feb 2 04:46:03 2011
In-Reply-To: <607FD0A3-4B1A-48AD-A299-F82FFE28F375@apnic.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:45:59 -0800
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
>> Are there any expectations of a Gold Rush for the remaining addresses? =
=A0I would expect to see at least see some kind of escalation.
>>
>
> This question probably calls for another picture.
>
> Here is a plot of 2009 and 2010 in terms of the average number of IPv4 ad=
dresses allocated on a daily basis, across all 5 RIRs. I've used a smoothin=
g function across the allocation data in order to clearly show the trend pa=
ttern over the two year period.
>
> http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/daily-allocs.jpg
>
> =A0Geoff
Oh master of the awesome graphingness...can you do a corresponding slide
for v6 allocation rates, so we can see if the runout is helping
inspire additional
interest for networks in perhaps investigating v6 more seriously?
Thanks!
Matt
