[136260] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Tue Feb 1 23:20:52 2011
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:19:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikxkvU-2-cyrc9_kU=v6d=KFdHCdoKppiQYcyOg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:05 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>=20
> More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an
> initial allocation and requiring more. People asking for the first
> one just indicates initial adoption rates.
>=20
> Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression
> that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for
> an extended period of time. If that is not true, then that's a flag.
I don't believe we've had an IPv6 "additional" request yet (but I look
forward to it happening at some point :-). I will check and get back
to the list with the definitive answer.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
