[136143] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Tue Feb 1 14:58:45 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D4824EF.2060801@brightok.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:57:23 +0100
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1 feb 2011, at 16:21, Jack Bates wrote:
> I still know a LOT of people who have no desire to switch. They are =
holding out until vendors implement the features they want. NAPTv6, =
default router in DHCPv6, etc, etc.
What's the point of switching to IPv6 if it repeats all the IPv4 =
mistakes only with bigger addresses?
If you like NAT IPv4 is the place to be, it'll only get more and more.=
