[136104] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Feb 1 07:05:09 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110201115315.GC7266@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:01:47 -0800
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: carlos@lacnic.net, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:53 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:18:17PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>> On 1 feb 2011, at 4:55, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>=20
>>> IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 =
-
>>> 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride.
>>=20
>> IPv4 is very dead in the sense that it's not going to go anywhere in =
the future.
>>=20
>> The rest is just procrastination.
>=20
>=20
> taking the long view - your statement applies equally to IPv6.
>=20
> of course YMMV
>=20
> --bill
I disagree. I think there is little, if any, innovation that will =
continue to be put
into IPv4 hence forth. I think there will be much innovation in IPv6 in =
the
coming years.
Owen
