[136091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fred Baker)
Tue Feb 1 03:11:42 2011
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=d8uBPRVBoN0U6jntz9o2da17D2w6DuE-cKwhS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:10:58 +0000
To: Jeremy <jbaino@gmail.com>
Cc: carlos@lacnic.net, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Jeremy wrote:
> Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If =
this
> doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't =
*fix*
> the problem here)
yes. The bottom line is that it only gives you a few more /8s, and every =
host and router in the net has to be updated to accept them. Doesn't =
actually solve the problem.=
