[136078] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Tue Feb 1 00:35:34 2011
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:25:24 -0500
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: Jeremy <jbaino@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=d8uBPRVBoN0U6jntz9o2da17D2w6DuE-cKwhS@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: carlos@lacnic.net, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:31:43PM -0600, Jeremy wrote:
> Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this
> doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix*
> the problem here)
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/240-e
Last real message? 31 Oct 2007
Done and done. V6, please.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
