[136075] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Tue Feb 1 00:27:40 2011
In-Reply-To: <CE295659-26AC-46C4-9983-11A295FDFA15@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:16:50 -0800
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: carlos@lacnic.net, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> Discussed, Disgusted, and Dismissed.
>
> The E space would take more software upgrades to existing systems than just
> deploying IPv6.
>
It's true. It was only after discovering how much work it would take
to make 240/4 like RFC 1918 (truly impossible) that I fully engaged in
doing IPv6. Now, we are pretty close to launching an IPv6-only + NAT64
service to mobile customer.
Cameron
===========================
T-Mobile USA IPv6 Beta -> http://bit.ly/9s0Ed3
===========================
