[136052] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon acquiring Terremark
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Beckman)
Mon Jan 31 22:55:02 2011
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:54:14 -0500
From: Peter Beckman <beckman@angryox.com>
To: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinBztKJ-q1HtBbcP29Kvn01emCXqteu+DGFbqj1@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Lyon
> <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net> wrote:
>> One cannot be owned by a carrier and remain carrier neutral.
>> My two cents,
>
> Agreed. An organization being a fully owned subsidiary of one carrier,
> and claiming to be completely carrier neutral, is an indelible conflict
> of interest;
One of my colleagues was discussing this today.
http://bit.ly/emZ7uA -> http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/wps/portal/...
Equinix has been claiming to have carrier neutral exchanges since Oct
2009. Who is using them and are they, in your opinion, being completely
carrier neutral? Maybe it is possible.
Beckman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beckman@angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
