[136008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andree Toonk)
Mon Jan 31 15:56:29 2011
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:55:28 -0800
From: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog@toonk.nl>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim2ABoNd-seC6pS_sNUCDxeTrabus4r2+0BkE4M@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: andree@toonk.nl
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 11-01-31 12:11 PM
Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> I understand this is by design, but I can imagine some operators will be
>> reluctant to actually drop routes when they start testing RPKI deployments
>> in their networks.
>
> yes, but what is the way forward?
Not sure, that was my original question:
Are there any suggestions or recommendations for how to handle these cases?
