[135903] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ML)
Sun Jan 30 18:31:31 2011
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:30:47 -0500
From: ML <ml@kenweb.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <201101302153.VAA20188@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
Reply-To: ml@kenweb.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/30/2011 4:53 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>>> I think it is too early in the deployment process to start dropping
>>> routes based on RPKI alone. We'll get there at some point, I guess.
>>
>> Do we really *want* to get to that point?
>
> I thought that was the point and the goal of securing the routing
> infrastructure is laudable. But the voices in my head say don't trust
> them with control of your routes, see what happened in Egypt.
>
> brandon
>
I would hope the response to the USG pressuring ARIN to diddle the RPKI
db would be disabling of RPKI queries by most BGP speakers.