[135885] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Sun Jan 30 15:48:39 2011
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:47:06 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: carlos@lacnic.net
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTing8yEVoDSxXsa+eTV0xZuv2qkYYA-ahT26hbFx@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 30/01/2011 17:39, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> The solution to this problem (theoretical at least) already exist in
> the form of RPKI.
So, what are peoples' routing policies on RPKI going to be? Are people
going to drop prefixes with no RPKI record? Or drop prefixes with an
incorrect RPKI record? Or drop prefixes with a revoked status?
I'm concerned that if we're trying to avoid another Youtube affair, the
RPKI policy acceptability criteria will have to be so strict that this may
have a serious effect on overall reachability via the internet.
Nick
