[135847] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: DSL options in NYC for OOB access
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan Finnesey)
Sun Jan 30 03:44:10 2011
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:40:19 -0800
In-Reply-To: <4D4513DA.8010800@bogus.com>
From: "Ryan Finnesey" <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>
To: "Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Yes depending on the building location in most places we have two
options for access cable plant (TWC, Comcast ect) or LEC. All via Layer
2.
Cheers
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]=20
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 2:32 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: Andy Ashley; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: DSL options in NYC for OOB access
On 1/29/11 9:30 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> All this out of band management talk is making me think it is an=20
> opportunity for a supper low cost DSL offering. Maybe a good way to=20
> get read of some capacity we have.
The key of course is that it not be coupled to the physical plant that
the other circuits use. I've been in a couple of facilties recently
(though not in ny) where riding into the building on twsited pair was at
best costly and more generally, infeasible.
joel
> Cheers
> Ryan
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Ashley [mailto:lists@nexus6.co.za]
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 3:42 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: DSL options in NYC for OOB access
>=20
> On 29/01/2011 14:56, Randy McAnally wrote:
>=20
>> Have you looked into the cross connect cost for your DSL line? They=20
>> typically aren't very cheap either.
>>
>> ~Randy
> Im still waiting for the quote to come back from L3.
> Figured a copper pair would be cheaper than a fiber, but who knows?
>=20
> Andy.
>=20
>=20
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by=20
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
