[135768] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jake Khuon)
Fri Jan 28 15:10:05 2011

From: Jake Khuon <khuon@neebu.net>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <7ACB6668-5DDC-4782-B775-F24A555EF45A@ianai.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:07:11 -0800
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: khuon@neebu.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 11:27 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

> I think it does not matter.  Censorship is censorship.  (So much for "routing around it".)

Obviously for the effected, the effects are the same. |8^)

However, I'm interested in knowing about the level of fine control that
the Egyptian government may have exercised.  I think the subtle
implications on the relationships between operators and governments bear
some fine distinction in such a case.

Also I think there will eventually be different consequences between an
indiscriminate mass disconnect of all telecom and network services and a
selective one where some of the infrastructure is left intact but under
tighter control... especially if internal reach is still selectively
available while external reach has been disabled.


-- 
/*=================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@NEEBU.Net> ]=================+
 | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers     /| / [~ [~ |) | | -------- |
 | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation  / |/  [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |   
 +==================================================================*/




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post