|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> In-Reply-To: <2DB499DF412E434C9F2E2917BA540171239466077D@USMACCR01.idgone.int> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:50:39 -0500 To: <JDuffy@nww.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Jim, On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:43 PM, <JDuffy@nww.com> wrote: > And would you comply with it if it indeed became law? For better or worse, companies will comply with lawful requests. In the = event of US Civil Unrest, I think it would be much harder than in other = regimes to exert this type of control, and would cause a much broader = global impact to economic activity. The same would happen with any = pan-european "blackout". For the economic reasons alone, I rate the chances of "kill-switch" a = zero. It makes for great reporting about power, but the practicality is = zero. (this does not preclude the US Government from disconnecting *its* = enterprise networks, as has happened with Bureau of Indian Affairs in = the past, etc...) - Jared Mauch=
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |