[135759] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What's the current state of major access networks in North
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Antonio Querubin)
Fri Jan 28 12:26:23 2011
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:26:17 -1000 (HST)
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D42E369.4040200@brightok.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jack Bates wrote:
> IPv4, standard termination routers (7206VXR), DHCP, no router CPE required,
> no request limitations. We'll have equivalent in IPv6 with DHCPv6, except we
> route prefixes for routers, but that won't effect the mac tables.
>
> Router 1: 1233
> Router 2: 1012
> Router 3: 2198
>
> and so on (just random routers). I don't see these numbers as being an issue.
It simply isn't an issue for us here either. It's not like we're
immediately trading an ARP table for a ND table that's hundreds of times
larger than the ARP table. Customers just don't change things that
quickly. And I would think aggregation equipment vendors who have been
eating their own dog food understand that too.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net
