[135736] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What's the current state of major access networks in North America
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Fri Jan 28 10:14:16 2011
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:14:04 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1101280737090.13151@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/28/2011 12:41 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> It's much cleaner to require a CPE at he customer prem, run LL only
> between CPE and PE, DHCPv6-PD a /56 or larger, and now you're done with
> it. No need to keep state for customer home devices, you just have to
> handle the CPE.
Except now you require a user to have a routed CPE. I'm up for classic
stateful DHCPv6 IA_TA addressing + DHCPv6-PD. Best of both worlds, and
in a proper setup, any address not assigned is null routed.
Jack
