[135619] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What's the current state of major access networks in North
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
Thu Jan 27 08:58:43 2011
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1101270306550.528@cust11794.lava.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:56:15 -0200
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlos@lacnic.net>
To: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I guess I won't need to add routes to my gateway, only subnetting on the
inside will probably do for the time being (a hub/spoke topology,
routing only between directly-connected subnets). And many ISPs allow
you to buy your own CPE.
Using an AirPort Extreme (or other home router with similar features)
in bridged mode would do the trick, i guess.
:-)
cheers,
Carlos
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
>
>> Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
>> I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
>> later.
>>
>> It might not be perfect, It might be ugly, but it will happen. And, if
>> you ask me, I would rather subnet a /64 than end up with a ipv6
>> version of NAT, a much worse alternative.
>
> Maybe not NAT but some kind of proxy ND and/or a migration from routing
> firewalls to bridging firewalls. =A0If the broadband provider is only
> providing a single /64, it's not likely they're gonna be willing to add
> routes to your gateway.
>
> Antonio Querubin
> e-mail/xmpp: =A0tony@lava.net
>
>
