[135615] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What's the current state of major access networks in North
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Antonio Querubin)
Thu Jan 27 08:11:28 2011
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:11:21 -1000 (HST)
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: carlos@lacnic.net
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=mjhRtHQYO1LD=9Ai2Tin+QCtdnNYkdYrf95z0@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
> I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
> later.
>
> It might not be perfect, It might be ugly, but it will happen. And, if
> you ask me, I would rather subnet a /64 than end up with a ipv6
> version of NAT, a much worse alternative.
Maybe not NAT but some kind of proxy ND and/or a migration from routing
firewalls to bridging firewalls. If the broadband provider is only
providing a single /64, it's not likely they're gonna be willing to add
routes to your gateway.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: tony@lava.net
